{
  "schema_version": "1.6.1",
  "id": "RPI-CVE-2026-64130",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T14:35:31Z",
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2026-64130"
  ],
  "published": "2026-07-19T15:41:06Z",
  "summary": "mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free",
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free\n\n__GFP_ZEROTAGS semantics are currently a bit weird, but effectively this\nflag is only ever set alongside __GFP_ZERO and __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.\n\nIf we run with init_on_free, we will zero out pages during\n__free_pages_prepare(), to skip zeroing on the allocation path.\n\nHowever, when allocating with __GFP_ZEROTAG set, post_alloc_hook() will\nconsequently not only skip clearing page content, but also skip clearing\ntag memory.\n\nNot clearing tags through __GFP_ZEROTAGS is irrelevant for most pages that\nwill get mapped to user space through set_pte_at() later: set_pte_at() and\nfriends will detect that the tags have not been initialized yet\n(PG_mte_tagged not set), and initialize them.\n\nHowever, for the huge zero folio, which will be mapped through a PMD\nmarked as special, this initialization will not be performed, ending up\nexposing whatever tags were still set for the pages.\n\nThe docs (Documentation/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst) state\nthat allocation tags are set to 0 when a page is first mapped to user\nspace.  That no longer holds with the huge zero folio when init_on_free is\nenabled.\n\nFix it by decoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_ZERO, passing to\ntag_clear_highpages() whether we want to also clear page content.\n\nInvert the meaning of the tag_clear_highpages() return value to have\nclearer semantics.\n\nReproduced with the huge zero folio by modifying the check_buffer_fill\narm64/mte selftest to use a 2 MiB area, after making sure that pages have\na non-0 tag set when freeing (note that, during boot, we will not actually\ninitialize tags, but only set KASAN_TAG_KERNEL in the page flags).\n\n\t$ ./check_buffer_fill\n\t1..20\n\t...\n\tnot ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory\n\tnot ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap/mprotect memory\n\t...\n\nThis code needs more cleanups; we'll tackle that next, like\ndecoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.\n\n[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/__GPF_ZERO/__GFP_ZERO/, per David]",
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Raspberry Pi OS:13",
        "name": "linux"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
      ],
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          }
        ]
      },
      "database_specific": {
        "per_version": {
          "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "66318c5b5cd8145a662303af12ed39ac07eb27cc",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.29",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.18.34"
          },
          "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "95b85bebbedcaedfa7ca79116ed38b7376fba412",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.33",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.18.34"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64130"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/738d18f1da3513d17b6f7bf30146cc4ac2480ffd"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f2aec5120b93a8f8b52dc50cdc60dbb8aec72f6"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a288a4ddb4a994490505ab5f41c445f8e6b6467"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "source": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git",
    "upstream_modified": "2026-07-19T15:41:06Z"
  }
}
