{
  "schema_version": "1.6.1",
  "id": "RPI-CVE-2025-22036",
  "modified": "2026-10-09T11:39:44Z",
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2025-22036"
  ],
  "published": "2025-04-16T14:14:59Z",
  "summary": "exfat: fix random stack corruption after get_block",
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix random stack corruption after get_block\n\nWhen get_block is called with a buffer_head allocated on the stack, such\nas do_mpage_readpage, stack corruption due to buffer_head UAF may occur in\nthe following race condition situation.\n\n     <CPU 0>                      <CPU 1>\nmpage_read_folio\n  <<bh on stack>>\n  do_mpage_readpage\n    exfat_get_block\n      bh_read\n        __bh_read\n\t  get_bh(bh)\n          submit_bh\n          wait_on_buffer\n                              ...\n                              end_buffer_read_sync\n                                __end_buffer_read_notouch\n                                   unlock_buffer\n          <<keep going>>\n        ...\n      ...\n    ...\n  ...\n<<bh is not valid out of mpage_read_folio>>\n   .\n   .\nanother_function\n  <<variable A on stack>>\n                                   put_bh(bh)\n                                     atomic_dec(bh->b_count)\n  * stack corruption here *\n\nThis patch returns -EAGAIN if a folio does not have buffers when bh_read\nneeds to be called. By doing this, the caller can fallback to functions\nlike block_read_full_folio(), create a buffer_head in the folio, and then\ncall get_block again.\n\nLet's do not call bh_read() with on-stack buffer_head.",
  "severity": [
    {
      "type": "CVSS_V3",
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
    }
  ],
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Raspberry Pi OS:12",
        "name": "linux"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
      ],
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v7l",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          }
        ]
      },
      "database_specific": {
        "per_version": {
          "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1~bpo12+1": {
            "linux_commit": "cd231d4775b14f228606c09f219b48308f6ab3aa",
            "upstream_version": "6.12.20",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.12.23"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Raspberry Pi OS:13",
        "name": "linux"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1",
        "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
      ],
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v7l",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v7l",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.19+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v6",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v7",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v7l",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.12.20+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1"
          }
        ]
      },
      "database_specific": {
        "per_version": {
          "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1~bpo12+1": {
            "linux_commit": "121c2c384b9c2f4790ffb31b2cd25c7d75c8fda0",
            "upstream_version": "6.12.19",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.12.23"
          },
          "1:6.12.19-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "121c2c384b9c2f4790ffb31b2cd25c7d75c8fda0",
            "upstream_version": "6.12.19",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.12.23"
          },
          "1:6.12.20-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "cd231d4775b14f228606c09f219b48308f6ab3aa",
            "upstream_version": "6.12.20",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": "6.12.23"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49b0a6ab8e528a0c1c50e37cef9b9c7c121365f2"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7447286363dc1e410bf30b87d75168f3519f9cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f807a6bf2005740fa26b4f59c4a003dc966b9afd"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bb7ff4204b6d4927e982cd256286c09ed4fd8ca"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "source": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git",
    "upstream_modified": "2026-08-05T12:19:11Z",
    "severity": {
      "source": "kernel CNA",
      "cvss_v3_score": 7.8,
      "cvss_v3_severity": "High",
      "scenario": "AV:L - The vulnerable path is reached through ordinary filesystem syscalls (read/mmap on a file on a mounted exFAT volume), requiring local access to the system. No network protocol handling is involved.\nAC:L - The attacker fully drives the triggering side \u2014 creating an unaligned valid_size, dropping page cache, and re-reading in an unbounded loop \u2014 and additionally controls which syscall frame occupies the stale stack slot when the deferred atomic_dec lands, so the corruption target is attacker-influenced rather than beyond their control.\nPR:L - A plain unprivileged local account with read/write access to an already-mounted exFAT volume (the default on Android SD cards, udisks2 automounts, and embedded media devices) suffices; no capability or root is required.\nUI:N - The attacker performs every step themselves \u2014 create the file, extend it, invalidate the cache, read it back \u2014 with no action by any other user; the exFAT mount is a pre-existing environmental condition, not a victim-supplied one.\nS:U - The stack corruption occurs within the kernel's own memory and does not cross into another security authority such as a hypervisor or IOMMU domain.\nC:H - This is a use-after-scope on the kernel stack; decrementing an attacker-chosen stack word (a length, index, or pointer in a subsequent syscall frame) yields out-of-bounds read primitives, and the mis-computed folio offset additionally reads on-disk block content into the wrong page-cache location.\nI:H - The deferred put_bh performs an unconstrained write (atomic decrement) into live kernel stack data of the attacker's task, corrupting saved registers, locals, or return addresses \u2014 a memory-corruption primitive usable for control-flow or data-only privilege escalation.\nA:H - Random kernel stack corruption reliably produces oopses and panics, and the attacker can repeat the trigger indefinitely to force a crash."
    }
  }
}
